Gojkovic

Country
Serbia
City
Belgrade

Statement: 

1. I am an emerging pessimist digital artist who does AI/Stable Diffusion assisted antinatalism themed art in the renaissance style. AI assisted, not AI created, there's a huge difference. There's not much quality art explicitly inspired by this and related philosophies, there's quite a void and I'm very excited to fill it, as much as I can, with as unique as thought-provoking paintings as possible. For a while I had this desire to do more traditional art, in addition to what I'm already doing, professionally and otherwise. For example, I enjoy renaissance paintings a lot. I wished to do paintings like that. Now, being captured by pessimism, and with the appearance of these AI txt to img tools, there was the opportunity to do what I wanted. New themes barely explored and new technique of art creation, which makes it very exciting.   

2. Regarding the process of creation, the first step of course is to come up with an idea and, this can take a while. Then you create a more polished sketch out of that initial scribble and sometimes as you do it, new ideas complementary to the core one come to mind. The next step is rendering lots of images in Stable Diffusion, of all the stuff that will be needed to make the painting. In the interest of time, I tend to open multiple Stable Diffusion tabs, 3 for each version. They are different in some respects, at least they gave me significantly different results for certain promts. One does certain things better and certain things worse than the other. 

Now, you first try your luck with the full description. You never know with these things, you might get lucky and the desired image, more or less complete, shows up. You try different arrangements of the description. If it doesn't work, and so far it hasn't, you have no choice but to start cutting the promt, prompting individual parts instead, and this proved to be the way to go. It takes a while to build this library of parts. The more renders per part the better, as you eventually end up with multiple proper angles, shapes and what not, to choose from. 

Even some shadows and highlights are originating from the renders, placed with the clone tool. You want to use the clone too as much as possible, and do hand-drawing only where it is necessary. For one, you want to keep that canvas texture on all the shades.

The next step is choosing which image to start the painting with, which one to use as the base. It's a scary moment, as this base image will kind of guide the rest of the process so, if you rush it and choose badly, you may need to start over again. After careful consideration, you pick one. Down the process, parts are taken from some of the collected renders (usually placed around the base image in Photoshop), carefully put together, each is then corrected or further perfected, with the clone tool or by hand. As the visual quality (lighting, its direction, painterly look etc. ) is nearly the same in all the renders, after all the work is done, you have an image that is quite coherent visually.

The exact process or technique is novel and the first piece was a proof of concept essentially. The question now is, is anything possible given enough time and effort? It may be too early to say though with the 3rd piece out, the answer seems positive. 

3. I do antinatalism/efilism (extension of it) inspired art. These are controversial pessimistic philosophies. I see these philosophies as golden mines in terms of the themes they provide for more original works of art, of all kinds, novels, games, movies, what have you. I noticed that I like doing things that basically no one has done before. It really makes me excited, this pioneering. So, what makes these so attractive to me is their obscurity, yet they pose very interesting and important questions about life, worthy of consideration. 

Inmendham's sabotage

Baby near birth is given a tape by Inmendham (one of contemporary antinatalist philosophers) which shows the bad experiences in baby's life not shown by the DNA's "bad experiences" tape. Due to horrors the baby would experience if born, it decides not to be, causing the DNA to go mad, to the joy of Inmendham.

It was intentionally made unclear whether the baby is the soldier or the person holding the knife, kind of equally bad. Lots of symbolism, e.g. the "NO" on the paper is under shadow symbolizing the baby's decision to remain in darkness or to not exist. The pen is connecting or pointing from the word "GOOD" to the word "NO" or non-existence etc.

The image is pointing to a (very) negative reality of life and is putting the viewer in an interesting hypothetical position and asking, what would you do? If you could see your entire life in advance and it happens to be full of horrors and suffering, would you still like to be born?